Rate The Video Game day 1- Super Mario Bros
 

This is being done in the wrestling forum so I figured we could try it here. Today's game is the classic Super Mario Bros for the 8 (edited thank you SuperSlim) bit Nintendo. This was one of it's finer games as it featured a plumber attempting to save a princess.

Graphics:
Time needed to complete the game:
Difficulty level:
Cost:

Rate from 1-10.

regular nintendo was 8 bit.

SNES was 16 bit

but anyway are we ratin this stuff compared to those times or present times?

Graphics: for that day :8 for today :2
Time needed to complete the game: for then 9 for now:4
Difficulty level: for then 8. for now: 4
Cost: for then 6. for now: 6

RETRO BABY!

http://amigameorlame.segmented.net/i...-Bros_Tile.jpg

http://www.truckpoint.com/techstop/t...ls/smb2jp2.jpg

http://www.nintendo.no/tipsogtriks/g.../snapshot2.jpg

http://www.ladydragon.com/1supermariodeluxe.jpg

I could just go on and on with this stuff. :) thanks for the memories!

Graphics:7
Time needed to complete the game:8
Difficulty level:7
Cost:10

total: 8

Rate these as you felt about them then, not right now.

Cost is for if it was worth your money or not

Graphics: 8
Time needed to complete the game: 10 took me a few years to actually beat world 8 but once I'd beat it I could complete the whole game in about 30 mins using the warps so it lost its replayability
Difficulty level: 8
Cost: 10

sorry, i hate using those average systems, but how the fuck can you not give this game a 10?

10

Graphics: 7
Time needed to complete the game: 9
Difficulty level: 7
Cost: 10

Graphics: 8
Time needed to complete the game: Um...never beat it back then. Beat it recently on an Emulator :$
Difficulty level: 7
Cost: 10

I'm going with Gohan here... the ratings doesn't add up right.

9

9.5

8.8

So this is the fate of TPWW.

9

Jesus christ :nono:

Cost means nothing when it comes to rating a game, and for a classic like Mario Bros, no need to rate the graphics, that would unfairly reduce the score. I still play Mario Bros on Mario All-Stars for NES and it's still one of the most difficult games I've ever played.

Gonna import my own personal rating system

Gameplay: 10
Storyline: 10
Graphics: N/A
Time Consumption: 8
Difficulty: 10 (by that I mean it's difficult at a reasonable degree)

Overall: 9.5

MVP sweet Jesus, I'm stealing your rating system

Good god, are we gonna have :Rate The ____" threads in every forum?

Anyway, I'll indulge this time. I'll use modified version ofMVP's system, since it's pretty much what I'd do anyway.

Gameplay: 10
Storyline: 10
Graphics: 9 (for the time that was pretty good)
Sound: 10 (still one of the best VG soundtracks to date)
Time Consumption: 9
Learning Curve: 9 (really easy to pick up, but not overly easy)
Overall: 9.5

<font color=goldenrod>Same here, exactly.</font> :y:

To calculate the average, you take the sum of all the individual ratinga and then divide by the number of individual ratings. That is the second time in 2 days that I've explained this. I'm starting to worry about the American education system.

Gameplay: 9
Storyline: 1
Graphics: 7 (FOR ITS TIME)
Time Consumption: 6
Difficulty: 8 (by that I mean it's difficult at a reasonable degree)

Overall: 6

Yeah Funky's got a good rating system.

Gameplay: 10
Storyline: 10
Graphics: 9.5
Sound: 10 (still have that tune in my head sometimes)
Time Consumption: 10 (difficult, but godamn fun too)
Learning Curve: 9 (I'll agree with FF here, it was pretty easy to pick up)

Despite the math, I'm still going to give it a 10. Changed the way I looked at videogames forever and that is more than enough to send it to the top.

lol

Why are people rating storyline so high?

IT HAD NO STORY

I'm just gonna give it a 9 - it was a great game for its time, but is very easy to complete