What's more impressive?
 

What's more/should be more impressive when it comes to world title runs...

Holding a title 5 times for a year+ for at least 3 of the reigns or holding a title 10 times for 4-6 months?

10 reigns....

Keeps the title race fresh and credible IMO

5 times for a year+ for at least 3 of the reigns, keeps it credible and meaningful. Unlike constantly switching the belt every few months which ruins a title changes significance and meaning. Unfortunately with the attention span of the American Wrestling viewer long reins don't work anymore (in this country [OF MORONS!])

I say a 10 time champion, because I think eventually the people will get sick of the guy who is holding the title for a year more than once.

Nick Mondo is impressive, his World's Greatist Blockbuster Employee for the month of March 02' is undisputed.