![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: What should be more important for a world championship? | |||
| 5 Reigns/1+ year for 3 |
|
5 | 71.43% |
| 10 Reigns/Bulk of them 4-6 Months |
|
1 | 14.29% |
| Triple H |
|
0 | 0% |
| Loose Cannon |
|
0 | 0% |
| CM Punk |
|
0 | 0% |
| Nick Mondo |
|
1 | 14.29% |
| Voters: 7. You must log in or register to vote on this poll. | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
He's Here
Posts: 60,735
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
What's more impressive?
What's more/should be more impressive when it comes to world title runs...
Holding a title 5 times for a year+ for at least 3 of the reigns or holding a title 10 times for 4-6 months? ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Mr. No MITB
Posts: 952
|
10 reigns....
Keeps the title race fresh and credible IMO |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
I am the cheese
Posts: 51,504
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
5 times for a year+ for at least 3 of the reigns, keeps it credible and meaningful. Unlike constantly switching the belt every few months which ruins a title changes significance and meaning. Unfortunately with the attention span of the American Wrestling viewer long reins don't work anymore (in this country [OF MORONS!])
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
The Mink
Posts: 4,224
|
I say a 10 time champion, because I think eventually the people will get sick of the guy who is holding the title for a year more than once.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Last of a Dying Forum
Posts: 16,215
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Nick Mondo is impressive, his World's Greatist Blockbuster Employee for the month of March 02' is undisputed.
|
|
|
|