TPWW Forums

TPWW Forums (https://www.tpwwforums.com/index.php)
-   wrestling forum (https://www.tpwwforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   Opinion Question... (https://www.tpwwforums.com/showthread.php?t=51233)

The One 09-17-2006 04:17 AM

Opinion Question...
 
How long do you think it would take (this is assuming they have flawless booking, and everyone stays healthy) for WWE to reach the level of national exposure and popularity it enjoyed during the Attitude Era?

MMercM 09-17-2006 05:01 AM

It really depends on the talent they keep/bring in.

I don't really know, but I would think it would be at least half a year.

The Fugitive 09-17-2006 05:42 AM

With just flawless booking and healthy wrestlers, it'll never reach that level, in my opinion.

If TNA or another promotion provides competition and you have the above components, then I would say more than a year, less than two years.

purewrestlingfan 09-17-2006 06:19 AM

Seriously I don't find it happening any time soon

Londoner 09-17-2006 07:16 AM

They need to end the roster split if that's going to have any chance of happening.

Kane Knight 09-17-2006 09:32 AM

Assuming flawless booking, they could have it by the Royal Rumble.

Crippla 09-17-2006 10:45 AM

There is NEVER flawless booking in the WWE.

Londoner 09-17-2006 11:02 AM

You can only have flawless booking(or atleast close to it) with a complete roster imo, not two seperate ones.

Pepsi Man 09-17-2006 11:07 AM

With flawless booking? Well, depending on what you mean by "flawless", I'd say six months.

What Would Kevin Do? 09-17-2006 11:27 AM

Flawless booking?


By this time next year.

El Fangel 09-17-2006 11:36 AM

WWE + Flawless booking + Healthy Wrestlers = Imcompatible equation components, please try again.

ron the dial 09-17-2006 12:54 PM

WWE won't reach that level of exposure and success again until they have some viable competition. Otherwise there's no incentive for new viewers to start tuning in.

Xero 09-17-2006 01:07 PM

I find the competition argument to be bullshit. Sure, it would force them to kick into super booking no bullshit mode, but they can still accomplish it if Vince would just step off a bit or start to book rationally and not booking his three brands as being on different levels.

To answer the question, No Way Out. Just after the Rumble to fire everyone up and just before Mania to do, well, even more firing up.

#1-norm-fan 09-17-2006 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kane Knight
Assuming flawless booking, they could have it by the Royal Rumble.


Shadow 09-17-2006 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kane Knight
Assuming flawless booking, they could have it by the Second Coming.


Xero 09-17-2006 01:15 PM

Hey, Shadow, Jeff was already resigned, and that hasn't happened.

ron the dial 09-17-2006 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xero Limit 126
I find the competition argument to be bullshit. Sure, it would force them to kick into super booking no bullshit mode, but they can still accomplish it if Vince would just step off a bit or start to book rationally and not booking his three brands as being on different levels.

To answer the question, No Way Out. Just after the Rumble to fire everyone up and just before Mania to do, well, even more firing up.

Sure, WWE could blow up again at any time if they put the effort into it. But with no one to give them incentive to put that effort forth, they just won't. Vince would rather go ahead with storylines that suck because he can. WWE gets consistent ratings no matter how bad the product, so why should they try any harder than they need to?

Shadow 09-17-2006 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xero Limit 126
Hey, Shadow, Jeff was already resigned, and that hasn't happened.

What the hell are you talking about?

Better Than You 09-17-2006 04:39 PM

This whole competition argument is bull shit. The NWA wasn't competition in the 80's and they still had a boom period. It's not a necessity.

Better Than You 09-17-2006 04:40 PM

Two years, imo.

ron the dial 09-17-2006 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Better Than You
This whole competition argument is bull shit. The NWA wasn't competition in the 80's and they still had a boom period. It's not a necessity.

Wrestling was also just gaining its first amount of mainstream success then. The product itself was fresh and new to a lot of people. Competition wasn't necessary to garner interest.

Kane Knight 09-17-2006 05:10 PM

Nor were wrestling promoters entirely complacent, because they had just dealt with LOTS of competition.

Schoenauer 09-17-2006 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The One
How long do you think it would take (this is assuming they have flawless booking, and everyone stays healthy) for WWE to reach the level of national exposure and popularity it enjoyed during the Attitude Era?

I'm going to say Wrestlemania 25 is when they'll get a boom. I don't know why WM25, but I just feel like in that many years the product will find some improvement.

gruntyking117 09-17-2006 11:56 PM

They don't need perfect booking. Perfect booking only gets the IWC. They need stronger cometition. Closest thing they got is TNA, and I don't see that becoming a viable enough enemy until by the end of next year or so. It'll be a whil before ratings can pick up again.

Pepsi Man 09-18-2006 12:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xero Limit 126
I find the competition argument to be bullshit. Sure, it would force them to kick into super booking no bullshit mode, but they can still accomplish it if Vince would just step off a bit or start to book rationally and not booking his three brands as being on different levels.

To answer the question, No Way Out. Just after the Rumble to fire everyone up and just before Mania to do, well, even more firing up.

Yeah, I sort of agree on the competition thing. Competition would motivate the WWE employees/bosses, not the fans. Most fans could give a shit if there's one major wrestling organization or a thousand; what will make them watch is compelling storylines, top-notch wrestling, proper booking, etc., etc., etc.

Kane Knight 09-18-2006 12:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gruntyking117
They don't need perfect booking. Perfect booking only gets the IWC. They need stronger cometition. Closest thing they got is TNA, and I don't see that becoming a viable enough enemy until by the end of next year or so. It'll be a whil before ratings can pick up again.

The IWC doesn't get won over by perfect booking.

Competition isn't the only thing needed. They need something cool enough to make it to the mainstream. The Rock and Austin and DX could do it. Competition kicks you in the ass, and makes you come up with or steal new ideas, but it's not the be-all. In fact, if Vince and his company were good at their job, competition wouldn't mean shit.

Fignuts 09-18-2006 01:17 AM

Never.

All the right pieces were in all the right places. It was the right time, with the right group of wrestlers, with the right competion, with a lot of the right scenarios. Oh, and not to mention flawless booking.

The chances of that happening again are slim to none.

The One 09-18-2006 01:24 AM

I think it could happen again, but I don't think it can happen within this decade. I think the soonest they could possibly have a second coming, so to speak, would have to be after 2012.

Y2Jeremy 09-18-2006 03:08 PM

First they would have to have the entertainment part down, and they are lacking a bit now. Then, something major would have to happen to bring national attention back to the company. without a major event, I will never happen.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:15 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®