For a WM Main Event, would you prefer...? (spoilers)
 

Taker won the Rumble. He can face either Batista or Cena.

It was reported months ago that Batista would be the one to end Taker's streak, but obviously, this would be idiotic for the guy Taker puts over to be a guy who might not even be wrestling in two or three years (due to age).

So it's obvious (though not necessarily good, depending on who you are). Have him face Cena. Lesser of two evils in my opinion, and if Taker is going to put someone over, it might as well be the guy he should have put over (but didn't) two or three years ago. Cena and Taker have history. Cena's the young star. Cena's probably staying in the WWE for a long time. Cena's badly booked, but at least he's a nice guy and cares about the business and doesn't have an ego.

So in the above choices (they're two, but I want to discern how many people are picking so-and-so because they want to versus because they have no better choice), would you prefer Taker vs Cena or Taker vs Batista?

I have the feeling they will give Taker the WHC title at WrestleMania

if they do Cena vs. Taker, I hope to God that Cena plays the heel in this one

BTW, this also allows Edge to keep his WM undefeated streak intact.

So does him winning the title.

What, no choice for Undertaker vs Lashley in a Last Ride Match? Talk about lame choices....

I think Taker deserves one last go-around as champ, and if they feed Taker's streak to Cena I might kill myself.

DOH! I knew I forgot something. :nono:

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Good one! Edge beating Cena at Wrestlemania!
:rofl: :rofl: