Which of these titles do you think is more credible/prestigious RIGHT NOW?
 

<TABLE id=HB_Mail_Container height="100%" cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0 UNSELECTABLE="on"><TBODY><TR height="100%" width="100%" UNSELECTABLE="on"><TD id=HB_Focus_Element vAlign=top width="100%" background="" height=250 UNSELECTABLE="off">The TNA world title
The ECW world title
The US championship
The IC strap


I'm wondering because it's funny to me that the ECW title is, in kayfabe, an equal world title with the other two. Yet, it occurs to me that the contenders and challengers for it weren't IC or US material on their show beforehand.
So do you think it means more to be ECW champion, US champion, or IC champion.

To me it seems that the company is just as high on pushing Punk MVP and Jeff Hardy equally.

I thought of this when I saw CM Punk in the 1 spot on the power 25. Even though that means nothing, it struck me as interesting to see Orton Batista and HHH all behind him.

</TD></TR><TR UNSELECTABLE="on" hb_tag="1"><TD style="FONT-SIZE: 1pt" height=1 UNSELECTABLE="on">

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

tna title

ECW World Title

I have to lean with the ECW Title, followed by the TNA World Heavyweight Title. The US belt follows, with the IC Title closing things up.

I'm viewing the ECW Title as a TV Title of sorts for WWE, a third-tier belt below the World and IC/US Titles.

TNA Title first.

I put ECW title above IC/US, kinda like for them in-between people, sometimes main eventers, sometimes IC/US contenders. People like Kane, Mr.Kennedy, Morrison, Punk, Umaga are all people I'd view as good ECW Champs. That kind of level anyway, just slightly better than the IC/US titles in the respect there's some people who may contend for the IC/US but wouldn't be good enough to go for the ECW title.

ECW