5 things you miss
 

1. Quality tag team division matches.
2. Orton's old enterance with the pyro.
3. Maria before becoming a playboy bitch.
4. Carlito and mic time.
5. Solo brand pay per views.

I haven't been around lately but isn't Vince worth a suspension after he racially abused Cena at Survivor Series 06. For the record, Cena
was born black... but then he got all MJ'd as he grew up.

1. Unified roster
2. Competition
3. Talent
4. Guys who are good on the mic
5. Swerves

1. Stable Wars
2: A good tag division
3: Good RAW's
4: the 'F'
5: Undercard titles (European/Hardcore)

1. Stable Wars
2. Nitro (made Raw better)
2. Tag division
3. Under card Titles
5. Talent worth watching

1. Stables. Enough said.

<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Qnk4_j_x9I0&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Qnk4_j_x9I0&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>

2. Old School Survivor Series. Yeah, A lot of time it was used to get a bunch of guys with nothing else on the card, but when done right, like here. RAW vs Smackdown, or afew guys with actual feuds together, it can be quite good

<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/hBqbAQfm73w&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/hBqbAQfm73w&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>

3. War Games. Again, enough said

<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/cRXUW46ZdDs&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/cRXUW46ZdDs&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>

4. I agree with KK, shit like this:
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/yxdB6WtxmlU&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/yxdB6WtxmlU&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>

5. Oh yeah, and this guy:
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/XSaiOC6vIz0&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/XSaiOC6vIz0&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>

Why are you guys counting up to 5? COME ON.

because we can't count to ten?

1. Owen Hart
2. Eddie Guerrero
3. Chris Benoit
4. Brian Pillman
5. Curt Henning

1-5: Professional Wrestling.

I would prefer a countdown rather than a countup.

Soon as they make a list feature for that, I'll be on it.

Look, I don't think it's asking too much that everyone here go back and change the numbers on their lists to go backwards, or physically rearrange the items on the list to account for the strength in which they miss the items, for posts I have already read and will probably not read again as well as future posts to follow suit. Really not a lot to ask.

Mine were nonsequential anyway. Would it make you feel better if I replaced the numbers with bullet points?

No, I feel that bullet points contribute to the violence in the workplace mentality. No asterisks either because then I feel like your are just invalidating or questioning yourself.

Mine were just random

http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...berdonwest.png http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...berdonwest.png http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...berdonwest.png http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...berdonwest.png http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...berdonwest.png. Paul Bearer
http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...berdonwest.png http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...berdonwest.png http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...berdonwest.png http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...berdonwest.png. Heel Doink
http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...berdonwest.png http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...berdonwest.png http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...berdonwest.png. Kennel from Hell
http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...berdonwest.png http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...berdonwest.png. Vignettes involving a corpse (see: Al Wilson, Katie Vick, Big Bossman's Dad)
http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...berdonwest.png. Robocop

Whoops, wrong order. Better edit that shiz.

Okay, you can't tell because I was able to edit that so efficiently that there is no edited tag, but I assure you that was originally a count up. I didn't even need to delete anything for 3, that's how quick it was!

Edit: Edited again to incorporate the DWRS, which was not quite as efficient but totally worth it.

1. The World Wrestling Federation. To me the second the company began to go downhill was the second they changed to the WWE six years ago. Quite frankly the WWE has become synonymous with mobile updates, diva searches, and watered down quality. That letter 'F' brought a much more intense substance to the company than 'E'. 'E' is the most common letter in the english language, 'E' is mundane, 'E' represents a monopoly in the wrestling business of a company whose mentality was that they won the war and that there is nothing else to prove. You're not supposed to tell us in your name that you are Entertainment, we are already supposed to know, no questions asked.

2. A combined roster. The idea of a brand split was pretty cool and first and could be nice if done properly, and for it while it was fine, but now it is just a huge mess. Adding the ECW brand was I think the stupidest move the WWE has ever done, as it watered down the roster to ridiculous levels, and devalued most of the belts the company had, more specifically the IC and US titles, by adding a third rate main event belt.

Having a combined roster with 60 or 70 guys makes for not a prestigious main event consisting of eight or so main eventers, but it also makes for a credible upper mid card with guys who can transition between into the main event, as well as a competitive mid card full of guys who can eventually work their way up the card. Today the WWE has only two types of wrestlers: main event and everybody else. No mid card with substance, and really a lackluster card all around.

3. Wrestlers with character. The thing that bothers me most about the WWE right now is that their main star (I am referring to John Cena) is a joke. He is a one dimensional character who they think is marketable because he acts like a bad ass, but they forget the most obvious of facts that he is a dorky white guy trying to act black. He is such, such an easy target for ridicule, and the WWE does nothing at all to assert that. And this is supposed to be the star you base your company around. In the glory days of the WWF they gave dimension to their characters, all the way down to the lower mid card. It wasn't filled by a bunch of indistinguishable Cody Rhodes that are just there to fill up space on the card, and the foundation of their main stars wouldn't come tumbling down just by having someone say to them, "I want you to go backstage and look in the mirror. Maybe afterwards you will realize that you are not black."

4. WCW. WCW was always fun to watch even in its down years. There will never be another company that can replace what they were able to achieve in terms of being a legitimate second wrestling company.

5. The Attitude Era. What made the Attitude Era was having the right wrestlers develop at the right time. Sure the WWE today can make their programming more cutting edge and violent again, but it would only be a shell of their former self. Right now the best I can do is compare it to the show ER: you liked it because the original characters were part of what made the show. As the original characters leave, you try to bring in some new characters to replace the ones that departed, and it just isn't the same.

Well, the damndest has forced me to enforce a new rule.

All lists and numbers here and throughout the site must now use the Don West Numbering Scale.

For example:
WrestleMania http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...berdonwest.pnghttp://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...berdonwest.pnghttp://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...berdonwest.pnghttp://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...berdonwest.pnghttp://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...berdonwest.png = WrestleMania 5

http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...berdonwest.png = First in a list

http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...berdonwest.pnghttp://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...berdonwest.png = Second in a list

And so on.

You can also use Roman Wests:

http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...berdonwest.pnghttp://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...berdonwest.png|http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...berdonwest.pnghttp://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...berdonwest.pnghttp://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...berdonwest.pnghttp://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...berdonwest.pnghttp://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...berdonwest.png = XXV

And so on.

Now you're just being ridiculous.

I don't think that Xero Limit http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...berdonwest.png-http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...berdonwest.pnghttp://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...berdonwest.png-http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...berdonwest.pnghttp://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...berdonwest.pnghttp://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...berdonwest.pnghttp://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...berdonwest.pnghttp://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...berdonwest.pnghttp://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...berdonwest.png is ridiculous at all.

I don't see any hyphens in your username.

The DWNS begins to use dashes at http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...berdonwest.png - _ - _

And, as you can see, the underscore replaces _'s.

I would like to have my computer put up Don West instead of on of the number+shift things. I could probably go without the percent symbol and just convert everything to decimals.

I'm glad we could all reach this conclusion.

Numbered, but in no particular order.

http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...berdonwest.pnghttp://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...berdonwest.pnghttp://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...berdonwest.pnghttp://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...berdonwest.pnghttp://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...berdonwest.pngWWF Event Center: A place where workers could put themselves over with cheesy promos with really awesome backgrounds. Seriously, those backgrounds RULED.

http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...berdonwest.pnghttp://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...berdonwest.pnghttp://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...berdonwest.pnghttp://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...berdonwest.pngMid-card: WWE's current opinion of card build-up can be summed up as Main Event and everyone else. Problem with that is simple: Your Shawn Micheals', your Undertakers, Your Triple Hs, and Your Batistas aren't gonna be wrestling forever (except maybe the Triple Hs.). You need to groom someone for that role once they retire, or if they fall to injury. Also, good mid-carders can help get the crowd into the match as well. But, why should we care about a midcard if they can all get crushed by one guy?

http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...berdonwest.pnghttp://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...berdonwest.pnghttp://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...berdonwest.pngDifferent Looking Wrestlers: Why the fuck is the WWE roster full of Tall, Muscular guys with short hair and a generic Tattoo on their arm? The only exceptions are the guys on top. The criteria suggested by Johnny Ace clearly doesn't work, especially when you consider that, of the biggest stars in WWE History, Only two people (Hulk Hogan and the Undertaker) meet the criteria. WHy should I give a shit about someone like Mike Knox, when I have seen a dozen guys on the WWE roster that look almost EXACTLY like him?

http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...berdonwest.pnghttp://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...berdonwest.pngPrograms that draw in the female fans: I'm not trying to sound gay or anything like that, but you can't focus on just one demographic. I'm sure the 18-34 year old male is important (I think that's the demographic), but you have to appeal to EVERYONE to get a successful program. The last time a program really worked on that level was the Matt Hardy-Edge feud, a feud that MADE Edge and has left Matt Hardy as Perenially over. Even that was botched. The Punk-Knox feud COULD have worked if they didn't drop the ball. The reuniting of Elizabeth and Savage from Wrestlemania 7 was huge because it got the female audience into the program.

Beyond just female fans, wrestling can reach across all demographics if booked properly.

http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...berdonwest.pngManagers: Not every wrestler is a good talker. Sometimes they need someone to do the talking for them. That's the role of the Manager. Not every wrestler is going to be over on their own. Sometimes they need someone who is associated with heat, thus giving themselves heat by proxy. Again, that's the role of the Manager.

hey Cas...The problem is, they have been booking to other demographics.

A few more:

- The old title belt.
- Shooting Star Press
- Lively crowds
- Catchphrases (there's some now, but almost every wrestler had one in the attitude era)
- When the Royal Rumble matches consisted of almost the entire roster.

Mickie wearing skirts
Undisputed Belt
Blue Eagle WWE Belt
Crazy Crowds
Nipple Slips

You should cut the right corner off and have that as your avatar Dezi.

http://img230.imageshack.us/img230/3616/ais242aom7.jpg

Sure as soon as I get my broadband connection back. I access tpww via mobile.

1. Tag teams.
2. Pay Per Views that arnt ALL championship matches.
3. Boogeyman promos.
4. Cruiserweight title.
5. Having cable so I can actually watch this clap. (crap)

Not successfully, apparently.

Oh, it's very successful. Cena's hot merchandise. the problem is, this is pro wrestling, and appealing to minority demographics over the majority is a bad idea.

Which is what I was trying to get at. Suggesting they market more to the minority demographics is more or less suggesting what they're doing. While the coveted market is 18-34 males, and wrestling will always be a guy's thing, they're marketing people based on how they do with kids, women, and so on. And merch sales are good, so....

Ok, I understand where you're coming from.

In that case, let me state this thing I miss, then...

http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...berdonwest.pnghttp://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...berdonwest.png Progams that actually result in an emotional investment in a character: I've always been more of a Jake Roberts fan than a Hogan fan. Some of his best storylines were the personal ones (the feuds with Rude, Savage, and DiBiase, and to a lesser extent the Martel feud). His feuds, as a face OR a heel, always made the fans give a shit about whoever the face was. I really see no need to give a shit about any face in the WWE right now. The last time a feud was done that generated an emotional investment in a character was the Matt Hardy/Edge feud. While Hardy was booked to be a non-threat to Edge for most of the feud, the fans got behind him. If they could sustain something like that with say, for shits and giggles, C.M. Punk, he'd be a bigger Merchandising draw than Cena.

But I'm sure you'll be able to prove me wrong, so I'll give you that shot, boss.

CM Punk already outdraws DX./