Who's more imposing Ezekiel or Mark Henry?
 

I was watching Rocky IV and it reminded me of something I wanted to ask, who do you find more imposing in wrestling big man a bodybuilder type (Eziekiel Jackson, Rob Terry, or Scott Stiener) or a strongman type (Mark Henry, Scott Norton, Vader)? I personally find the strongman type more imposing. The 350 to 400 lb former football player or power lifter seems like someone I'd not want to mess with, even compared to a 250 to 300 lb pure muscle guy.

Powerlifter

Bodybuilders defintely can't split wigs

The big black man

I would never want to find myself in an alley with Norton or Henry

They would rip my asshole apart.

And Vader, 80s and 90s Vader, not the one who fell on his ass a couple years ago

Stongman, but I belive that Jackson would fall under both categories.

Word, Vader is the single most dominant heel ever. I loved 1994 Vader

Check out his work in Japan from 1998-2000, it will freak your mind.

I refuse to watch vader in japan prior to his WWE run, it will never live up

Mark Henry all the way.

I mean post his WWE run

Because his early Japan work was awesome

I'd go for the strongman. Bodybuilders are about looking good, strongmen are about being able to really DO shit.

I'd rather see a smaller hired gun. If built right, a guy like Tajiri could be more imposing than either one.

Agreed.

"He's like a damn buzzsaw cutting down a giant redwood!" [/JR]

And don't forget the mist.

I miss Asian Mercenaries

had to go with the strongman