Quote:
Originally Posted by darkpower
Actually, I think it was Activision that was whining like a bitch that it was EA that wasn't wanting it, and the EA whined right back that it was Activision that was blocking it. I don't know anything about Sony having anything to do with it (no one on either side was whining about Sony having anything to do with it). Here is an article from IGN from Oct. 2007 that tested everything as it worked at that point. And then this: http://www.boston.com/business/techn...d_with_gamers/ , that does say something about Activision being the bitch about it (not Sony).
As far as me loving Sony "that much", I could say the same about you and Microsoft. Though I'm not about to begin that fight here (though I know you're looking to start one here). |
Of course, if you said I loved Microsoft "so much," you'd be lying. You, on the other hand, seem to disregard facts when it comes to things which make Sony look bad.
Like, for example, the decision came down to Sony to quell the patch. Activision whined, but Sony was the one who had the power and took action. Hence my statement that they cock blocked it. You know, because they did.
Or, for another example, asking why Microsoft hasn't taken steps to do something their system's version of Rock Band could do out of the box back when it launched. Sony waited a year to lift their foot on the matter.
Too bad not everything is equal. I know you like to play the conspiracy card, that people don't call me a fanboy because they like me so much (With 20 individual people whining about me CURRENTLY, you just look retarded making the comment), but when your complaints go against the facts, whereas mine don't, is it hard to see why you'd be viewed as a fanboy?
Come on, DP. You're not
that stupid.