HOLY CRAP!!!---Rock Band

[Kane Knight]

Originally Posted by darkpower Actually, I think it was Activision that was whining like a bitch that it was EA that wasn't wanting it, and the EA whined right back that it was Activision that was blocking it. I don't know anything about Sony having anything to do with it (no one on either side was whining about Sony having anything to do with it). Here is an article from IGN from Oct. 2007 that tested everything as it worked at that point. And then this: http://www.boston.com/business/techn...d_with_gamers/ , that does say something about Activision being the bitch about it (not Sony). As far as me loving Sony "that much", I could say the same about you and Microsoft. Though I'm not about to begin that fight here (though I know you're looking to start one here).

Of course, if you said I loved Microsoft "so much," you'd be lying. You, on the other hand, seem to disregard facts when it comes to things which make Sony look bad.

Like, for example, the decision came down to Sony to quell the patch. Activision whined, but Sony was the one who had the power and took action. Hence my statement that they cock blocked it. You know, because they did.

Or, for another example, asking why Microsoft hasn't taken steps to do something their system's version of Rock Band could do out of the box back when it launched. Sony waited a year to lift their foot on the matter.

Too bad not everything is equal. I know you like to play the conspiracy card, that people don't call me a fanboy because they like me so much (With 20 individual people whining about me CURRENTLY, you just look retarded making the comment), but when your complaints go against the facts, whereas mine don't, is it hard to see why you'd be viewed as a fanboy?

Come on, DP. You're not that stupid.

[darkpower]

Originally Posted by Kane Knight Of course, if you said I loved Microsoft "so much," you'd be lying. You, on the other hand, seem to disregard facts when it comes to things which make Sony look bad. Like, for example, the decision came down to Sony to quell the patch. Activision whined, but Sony was the one who had the power and took action. Hence my statement that they cock blocked it. You know, because they did. Or, for another example, asking why Microsoft hasn't taken steps to do something their system's version of Rock Band could do out of the box back when it launched. Sony waited a year to lift their foot on the matter. Too bad not everything is equal. I know you like to play the conspiracy card, that people don't call me a fanboy because they like me so much (With 20 individual people whining about me CURRENTLY, you just look retarded making the comment), but when your complaints go against the facts, whereas mine don't, is it hard to see why you'd be viewed as a fanboy? Come on, DP. You're not that stupid.

Not stupid enough to just believe it without any further proof, because every single person that reported on it was stating that Activision was the one blocking the fucking thing (think about it: Does the 360 have FULL compatibility in which any guitar controller will completely work with any game? You seem to forget that not all controllers are working for all games, either in the way they should or at all). And, in case you forgot what I said, as well, I'm also hoping that MS does see this and enforces a mandate, as well (READ: I'm not hoping that they never do anything like that just to have Sony get an upper hand). You throwing random facts to support the claim that you're right and I'm wrong without any means to back anything up is making you look blind and stupid. I showed you actual proof to back up my claim (even from a place that would have no pony in any "console war") that Actlivision and EA were locked in a battle as to who was exactly blocking the patch, EA or Activision. No mention of Sony having ANY role in that was in there. You've yet to show me any proof since you made that claim (which I never heard from anyone before), so who's to say you didn't just pulled that fact out of your ass?

Face it, dude, you pulled an epic fail this time. Give it up!

[Kane Knight]

Originally Posted by darkpower Not stupid enough to just believe it without any further proof, because every single person that reported on it was stating that Activision was the one blocking the fucking thing (think about it: Does the 360 have FULL compatibility in which any guitar controller will completely work with any game? You seem to forget that not all controllers are working for all games, either in the way they should or at all). And, in case you forgot what I said, as well, I'm also hoping that MS does see this and enforces a mandate, as well (READ: I'm not hoping that they never do anything like that just to have Sony get an upper hand). You throwing random facts to support the claim that you're right and I'm wrong without any means to back anything up is making you look blind and stupid. I showed you actual proof to back up my claim (even from a place that would have no pony in any "console war") that Actlivision and EA were locked in a battle as to who was exactly blocking the patch, EA or Activision. No mention of Sony having ANY role in that was in there. You've yet to show me any proof since you made that claim (which I never heard from anyone before), so who's to say you didn't just pulled that fact out of your ass? Face it, dude, you pulled an epic fail this time. Give it up!

Do you know how to properly make paragraphs?

Anyway, your "epic fail" comment is is baseless, like most of your claims.

I tells ya, Activision has no power to block a patch. It's Sony's decision, and they are the only ones with the authority. This is even alluded to right in the proof to the "contrary" JC just linked to.

By the way, you're "hoping" that Microsoft will do something they've been doing, asking why they haven't done something they've been doing, and applauding Sony for finally coming up with a standard for their previously non-standardised Bluetooth products.

To make an analogy, that's the equivalent of Microsoft finally coming out with a non-proprietary HDD, and some Microsoft fanboy saying that they hope that Sony looks into this in the future and one day adds it to the PS3. Sony did it out of the box, but this fucktard is acting as though it's something new that Microsoft did first.

For clarification, I just indirectly called you a fucktard, because Microsoft has a standard for wireless controllers in place, and has since they first allowed companies to use it. Sony didn't. When Activision whined, they cock blocked the update, and finally, they're letting it throught. SONY had to approve it; they didn't. And you're still making comments hoping they'll catch up.

So are you lying, or just too stupid to know better?

It's not about Sony having a hand up, it's about you being wrong. You make it about me wanting to take down Sony because you yourself want that to be the case, because if that's the case, you're not pulling all this out of your ass.

Too bad you still are.