Quote:
Originally Posted by Instant Classic
I always found Stone Cold to be more entertaining in he ring than HHH. Is HHH maybe the better technical wrestler? Yes. Is he the better entertainer? No.
Stone Colds matches were better worked in the sense they were more entertaining. Stone Cold wasn't terrible, he focused more on the psychology of the match and less on the technical aspect.
|
Triple H and Stone Cold certainly had different styles but at the end of the day, both men became great champions. It's like comparing Michael Jordan to Wilt Chamberlin. Both men were legends, but had different styles and approaches.
Both Triple H and Austin brought a lot of tremendous elements to the proverbial table, and I think that you need to respect that.