TPWW Forums  

Go Back   TPWW Forums > w r e s t l i n g > wrestling forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-10-2009, 05:30 PM   #1
IC Champion
They/Them
 
IC Champion's Avatar
 
Posts: 15,331
IC Champion makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)IC Champion makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)IC Champion makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)IC Champion makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)IC Champion makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)IC Champion makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)IC Champion makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)IC Champion makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)IC Champion makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)IC Champion makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)IC Champion makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)IC Champion makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)IC Champion makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
I always found Stone Cold to be more entertaining in he ring than HHH. Is HHH maybe the better technical wrestler? Yes. Is he the better entertainer? No.

Stone Colds matches were better worked in the sense they were more entertaining. Stone Cold wasn't terrible, he focused more on the psychology of the match and less on the technical aspect.
IC Champion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2009, 05:35 PM   #2
Destor
I am the cheese
 
Destor's Avatar
 
Posts: 51,475
Destor makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Destor makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Destor makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Destor makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Destor makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Destor makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Destor makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Destor makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Destor makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Destor makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Destor makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Destor makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Destor makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Instant Classic View Post
I always found Stone Cold to be more entertaining in he ring than HHH. Is HHH maybe the better technical wrestler? Yes. Is he the better entertainer? No.

Stone Colds matches were better worked in the sense they were more entertaining. Stone Cold wasn't terrible, he focused more on the psychology of the match and less on the technical aspect.
I took your statement as saying Autsin was a better worker, which generally means you thinkn guy A is a harder worker than guy B in the ring. Which H out works Austin.
Destor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2009, 05:38 PM   #3
Scott Delaney
 
Posts: 440
Scott Delaney has a great deal of rep (15,000+)Scott Delaney has a great deal of rep (15,000+)Scott Delaney has a great deal of rep (15,000+)Scott Delaney has a great deal of rep (15,000+)Scott Delaney has a great deal of rep (15,000+)Scott Delaney has a great deal of rep (15,000+)Scott Delaney has a great deal of rep (15,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Instant Classic View Post
I always found Stone Cold to be more entertaining in he ring than HHH. Is HHH maybe the better technical wrestler? Yes. Is he the better entertainer? No.

Stone Colds matches were better worked in the sense they were more entertaining. Stone Cold wasn't terrible, he focused more on the psychology of the match and less on the technical aspect.
Triple H and Stone Cold certainly had different styles but at the end of the day, both men became great champions. It's like comparing Michael Jordan to Wilt Chamberlin. Both men were legends, but had different styles and approaches.

Both Triple H and Austin brought a lot of tremendous elements to the proverbial table, and I think that you need to respect that.
Scott Delaney is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®