Thread: Question: TNA VS WWE
View Single Post
Old 02-28-2010, 02:48 PM   #4
screech
Shelly Martinez = Ratings
 
screech's Avatar
 
Posts: 23,625
screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Show Off View Post
If all that is true, which I'll agree to that to a point, then it was the WWE's failure to utalize their talent properly. If they were good at utalizing talent they would have known that Randy Orton wasn't ready to with the title and shouldn't have given him the belt.

If the WWE pushed Randy Orton to the title and he wasn't ready than the WWE failed along with Randy Orton. It's just logic.

It can't be one or the other, it has to be both.
This. You can't hang failure of a character solely on the worker. WWE is as much to blame for not realizing what works with some can't work with all.
screech is offline   Reply With Quote