View Single Post
Old 02-03-2015, 07:12 PM   #15
#1-norm-fan
Resident drug enabler
 
#1-norm-fan's Avatar
 
Posts: 45,473
#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smelly Meatball View Post
I'd say no mostly because of WWE's horrible track record in recent years when it comes to long term plans.
Not only that but... it's not like the product is growing by leaps and bounds because of any of this. You can say it makes Daniel Bryan fans more passionate to have had him compete in title matches and come up short basically from SummerSlam to WrestleMania last year, but is that really something you wanna do at the expense of every PPV other than WrestleMania and SummerSlam?

I'm not even a supporter of Daniel Bryan in the main event but if you actually believe that WWE has been behind him as the guy all this time and it's all planned out, then you're basically saying that the plan is to intentionally "fuck up" the endings of nearly every PPV he's involved in to the point where you're actually turning a lot of people off of the product in order to push one or two PPVs a year.
#1-norm-fan is offline   Reply With Quote