Thread: Bret Hart's response to Flairs comments
View Single Post
Old 07-12-2004, 09:04 PM   #39
Zen v.W.o.
GO HABS GO!
 
Zen v.W.o.'s Avatar
 
Posts: 4,018
Zen v.W.o. has a great deal of rep (15,000+)Zen v.W.o. has a great deal of rep (15,000+)Zen v.W.o. has a great deal of rep (15,000+)Zen v.W.o. has a great deal of rep (15,000+)Zen v.W.o. has a great deal of rep (15,000+)Zen v.W.o. has a great deal of rep (15,000+)Zen v.W.o. has a great deal of rep (15,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by loopydate
I'm not saying Vince shouldn't have agreed to it, because he really had no reason to believe that Bret would walk out on him (good call, Vince ). In a world of Creative Control clauses, that one made sense.

I'm saying that Creative Control clauses are the devil's handiwork and shouldn't exist at all, because they give wrestlers a sense of entitlement that, frankly, they don't deserve. Bret shouldn't have had one, Michaels shouldn't have one, Triple H shouldn't have one, no one should have Creative Control clauses in their contracts.

Because of situations like this.

...

Okay, I got ya. I can understand your point of view.
Zen v.W.o. is offline   Reply With Quote