I'm not saying Vince shouldn't have agreed to it, because he really had no reason to believe that Bret would walk out on him (good call, Vince ). In a world of Creative Control clauses, that one made sense.
I'm saying that Creative Control clauses are the devil's handiwork and shouldn't exist at all, because they give wrestlers a sense of entitlement that, frankly, they don't deserve. Bret shouldn't have had one, Michaels shouldn't have one, Triple H shouldn't have one, no one should have Creative Control clauses in their contracts.
Because of situations like this.
...
Okay, I got ya. I can understand your point of view.
07-12-2004, 09:04 PM
). In a world of Creative Control clauses, that one made sense.
Threaded Mode