Thread: Raw rating lowest since July 2012
View Single Post
Old 02-05-2016, 08:41 PM   #1
#1-norm-fan
Resident drug enabler
 
#1-norm-fan's Avatar
 
Posts: 45,473
#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by The CyNick View Post
Also no shifting about RAW.

The problem is you dont have all the information. You go to one website and you think you know everything. There are more details to understand.

Ive never claimed WWE does the best rating, I always talk about viewership. And when you look further into the numbers you would see for men 18-49 RAW more than doubles the rating (not viewership) that Love and Hip Hop does, but Love and Hip Hop more than doubles the women 18-49 rating that RAW does. This week it netted out better for Hip Hop because a lot of people were watching election coverage, and that rating skews more towards men. So RAW will be more impacted because its show relies more heavily on men.
No. You're shifting. 18-49 is the key demo. You've admitted as much yourself. But Raw loses in that demo. So you have to shift the key demo to MEN 18-49 so you can say that Raw wins in the key demo despite the fact that they don't. You change the definition so it works for you. It's blatant shifting. lol
#1-norm-fan is offline   Reply With Quote