View Single Post
Old 02-08-2016, 02:08 PM   #35
road doggy dogg
wekasauce
 
road doggy dogg's Avatar
 
Posts: 106,951
road doggy dogg makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)road doggy dogg makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)road doggy dogg makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)road doggy dogg makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)road doggy dogg makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)road doggy dogg makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)road doggy dogg makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)road doggy dogg makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)road doggy dogg makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)road doggy dogg makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)road doggy dogg makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)road doggy dogg makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)road doggy dogg makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SlickyTrickyDamon View Post
I think Daniel Bryan is the one with grounds to sue. Unfair practices of having a scientist (doctor) have result-based testing is unethical. A doctor answers to a patient first.
Do you have a detailed report of what the WWE's doctors' grounds for clearing him are?
road doggy dogg is offline   Reply With Quote