Thread: REHASHING AN OLD ARGUMENT: Who would you rather have on your roster right now?
View Single Post
Old 09-24-2017, 07:20 PM   #92
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,527
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruien View Post
Not to Noid's standards.
I'll just re-post what I said in retort to this:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Noid View Post
I don't see how Rusev being built perfectly for like a year, which did earn him goodwill, is evidence that good booking didn't help Braun? I wouldn't say that Rusev is the same type of performer as Braun though. Rusev was always presented as more of a "tank." A lot more of a hybrid and agile sort of guy with a "legit" background. Strowman was always "big."
* Rusev and Braun are different animals. Kind of apples and oranges. But those are fruit.

* In both circumstances, good booking made juice. You can't say "Well, Braun produced juice while Rusev didn't." When they were juiced it worked.

* Now I want juice.

While I agree with Fan that it has been a while since you saw someone like that pushed -- because Braun and Rusev are different -- I'd disagree that it's been that long since we saw good booking work, which emphasizes his point. You talk about Rusev like his undefeated push was bad. I wasn't a fan of Rusev at the time, but I wouldn't say that it was either bad nor well received.

What is your point?
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote