REHASHING AN OLD ARGUMENT: Who would you rather have on your roster right now?

[Mr. Nerfect]

Originally Posted by Ruien Not to Noid's standards.

I'll just re-post what I said in retort to this:

Originally Posted by Noid I don't see how Rusev being built perfectly for like a year, which did earn him goodwill, is evidence that good booking didn't help Braun? I wouldn't say that Rusev is the same type of performer as Braun though. Rusev was always presented as more of a "tank." A lot more of a hybrid and agile sort of guy with a "legit" background. Strowman was always "big."

* Rusev and Braun are different animals. Kind of apples and oranges. But those are fruit.

* In both circumstances, good booking made juice. You can't say "Well, Braun produced juice while Rusev didn't." When they were juiced it worked.

* Now I want juice.

While I agree with Fan that it has been a while since you saw someone like that pushed -- because Braun and Rusev are different -- I'd disagree that it's been that long since we saw good booking work, which emphasizes his point. You talk about Rusev like his undefeated push was bad. I wasn't a fan of Rusev at the time, but I wouldn't say that it was either bad nor well received.

What is your point?