Thread: Vincent Kennedy McMahon : Genius or just brute force ?
View Single Post
Old 11-17-2021, 04:46 AM   #2
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,634
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by The God of TPWW View Post
But their model has always been "build around 1 top babyface". It's a model that has worked for them financially for years.

They are also making money hand over fist.
Yeah, and you can’t exactly call John Cena and Roman Reigns failures. Ratings may not have held great under Cena, but the entire PG beautification of the WWE was done under him. In some ways, he’s as important as Hulk Hogan and Steve Austin.

I don’t think he really cares if Keith Lee gets over or not. And that may not be to every fan’s taste, but it’s not really pertinent to the genius debate, unless you want to strongly argue that a variety of acts being over would make a better model. In which case, I would point out the WWE does have a variety of acts that are over, to some degree.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote