Which trilogy has been this generations "trilogy"?

[Zen v.W.o.]

Originally Posted by Kane Knight Ruling out any of these series because they're not really a trilogy is stupid. LotR will have a fourth movie, intended as art of the same series. Not a trilogy. The odds that Spidey or Pirates will remain three movies are about the same as me walking on water. So... They're all trilogies, or they're none of them trilogies. I don't think any of these count as the best, but really. Pirates and Spider-Man both blow away Lord of the Rings in terms of fan acceptance and response, which is what makes something a cultural phenomenon, a classic, etc. I'm not shitting on LotR, but still.

What are you on about?? In fact, it got more fan acceptance then it even thought it might before they released the films and that only grew with each movie.

LOTR very easily for the simple fact it had better acting and actors, it had a terrific story that came from a terrific mind who created some outstanding books, they managed to take such a difficult novel and tranform it magnificently on the big screen, which was not an easy task at all. The film had depth. It was epic, and it was well told. Outstanding movies.

Not one spidey flick even compares to any of the LOTR films. Not one. In fact, Batman is better then spiderman. The spidey flicks had cheesey, lame romance parts to hook the chicks, a dweeb playing the main character, and it was way too computerized, that it looked fucking fake as fuck. I may as well have been watching a video game. Dont like that shit. It was too much.
There was nothing about spiderman that tops anything LOTR managed to do.

Pirates doesnt really rank up there either. It's not even close really.