Classic announcer lines that made moments...

**Mr. Nerfect** · 03-02-2008, 09:06 PM

The WWE needs to put its commentators on a moral scale. Kind of like political leanings. You have your far left-wing, but you also have your Democrats that lean a little more towards the right. There are extremely conservative Republicans, but you also have your left-leaning more tolerable ones (sorry).

Commentary should be the same. Jim Ross should be as face as a commentator can get. To the point where he is so nice, he is even good to the heels, and admits their strength. Joey Styles seems like a far face character, in my opinion, too. More analytical and less emotional than JR, though. Michael Cole and Todd Grisham are your smarmy, arrogant play-by-play guys.

Cole does not play the good guy sympathizer well. His bias is too strong, and it's awkward. He should be more of a little shit who kisses his boss' ass. He should stop acting like he's marking out as much as he does, and take a more calm, journalistic approach to his commentary. He can talk about The Undertaker's success at WrestleMania in journalistic awe, and statistically quote Batista as one of the greatest World Heavyweight Champions of all-time.

Todd Grisham is a little shit, and is actually entertaining while he's doing it. Grish is actually a funny guy, and would be great as a heel colour commentator, who just sits on the commentary team because he's hosted Soccer broadcasts before. Grish as the arrogant golden child commentator would be pretty fucking good, in my opinion. Josh Mathews should be the work horse of the team, with Grisham making things easier with his humor.

Lawler should be an asshole, Tazz should be more based on how good someone is in the ring than their storyline positioning, and Jonathan Coachman should not get along with Cole, and talk about how he's a better play-by-play guy than Cole, and he never even calls a move. Of course, Coach should also go back to being an on-screen character, and Bill DeMott should be rehired for commentary.

03-02-2008, 09:06 PM	#21
Mr. Nerfect Posts: 61,634	The WWE needs to put its commentators on a moral scale. Kind of like political leanings. You have your far left-wing, but you also have your Democrats that lean a little more towards the right. There are extremely conservative Republicans, but you also have your left-leaning more tolerable ones (sorry). Commentary should be the same. Jim Ross should be as face as a commentator can get. To the point where he is so nice, he is even good to the heels, and admits their strength. Joey Styles seems like a far face character, in my opinion, too. More analytical and less emotional than JR, though. Michael Cole and Todd Grisham are your smarmy, arrogant play-by-play guys. Cole does not play the good guy sympathizer well. His bias is too strong, and it's awkward. He should be more of a little shit who kisses his boss' ass. He should stop acting like he's marking out as much as he does, and take a more calm, journalistic approach to his commentary. He can talk about The Undertaker's success at WrestleMania in journalistic awe, and statistically quote Batista as one of the greatest World Heavyweight Champions of all-time. Todd Grisham is a little shit, and is actually entertaining while he's doing it. Grish is actually a funny guy, and would be great as a heel colour commentator, who just sits on the commentary team because he's hosted Soccer broadcasts before. Grish as the arrogant golden child commentator would be pretty fucking good, in my opinion. Josh Mathews should be the work horse of the team, with Grisham making things easier with his humor. Lawler should be an asshole, Tazz should be more based on how good someone is in the ring than their storyline positioning, and Jonathan Coachman should not get along with Cole, and talk about how he's a better play-by-play guy than Cole, and he never even calls a move. Of course, Coach should also go back to being an on-screen character, and Bill DeMott should be rehired for commentary.