Quote:
Originally Posted by The MAC
Bret Hart was a more believable wrestler.He worked the legs of a tall wrestler in preparation for the sharpshooter.He didn't have to use the steps or announcers tables to make the good moments. His punches look so solid.
Shawn michaels is also great in the ring but in a different way. You can see bret in a real fight with his style but with shawns style its just too flashy for realism.
Shawn michaels takes a beating then nips up like nothing happened..that always annoyed me because he is supposed to be tired and barely hanging on by that point.
Did he try to nip up when the marines at the bar beat the shit out of him?
|
So basically, Bret had better psychology and was a more realisitc wrestler. Both factually correct points. Let me add: He was just plain better.