UFC runs a better wrestling company than the wwe does

**HeartBreakMan2k** · 07-17-2009, 07:06 PM

Really it's simple stuff like 3 on one attacks should be complete domination. That's what would bring an element of realism back. WWE should book using logic. If A happens, than B should ensue. If person A beats person B, than person A is better and should be in title contention where as person B should not. I think you guys are completely over-reacting to good 'ol Crashbang and that's really all he was implying.

07-17-2009, 07:06 PM	#11
HeartBreakMan2k Franchise of TPWW Posts: 15,458	Really it's simple stuff like 3 on one attacks should be complete domination. That's what would bring an element of realism back. WWE should book using logic. If A happens, than B should ensue. If person A beats person B, than person A is better and should be in title contention where as person B should not. I think you guys are completely over-reacting to good 'ol Crashbang and that's really all he was implying.