Red Dead Redemption

**Requiem** · 05-27-2010, 05:15 PM

I just don't get the complaints about one being so similar to another, when the same comparisons could be drawn between FO3 and Oblivion. FO3 wasn't an improvement on that game at all, and they were more similar in feel/gameplay than RDR is to GTA, IMO. FO3 was an extremely lazily developed game, IMO. It lacks polish.

What I'm saying is... why complain that one game is too similar to another, and then say "But this game was great" when it did the exact same thing you're accusing the other of?

I just find RDR to be a far better attempt at 'using something that works', than the other did.

05-27-2010, 05:15 PM	#11
Requiem Posts: 19,301	I just don't get the complaints about one being so similar to another, when the same comparisons could be drawn between FO3 and Oblivion. FO3 wasn't an improvement on that game at all, and they were more similar in feel/gameplay than RDR is to GTA, IMO. FO3 was an extremely lazily developed game, IMO. It lacks polish. What I'm saying is... why complain that one game is too similar to another, and then say "But this game was great" when it did the exact same thing you're accusing the other of? I just find RDR to be a far better attempt at 'using something that works', than the other did.