Quote:
Originally Posted by RGWhat316
Well, I'm glad the situation isnt true anyways, even though with Vince's state of mind lately, its not that far out of the question. And the website did update with this:
The source of the original story was Dave Meltzer of F4WOnline.com and here is a direct quote he made in response to Scherer's report:
"Marketing people were given a directive last week regarding Shawn. There was some idea, not sure what, it had passed every stage, had been okayed at the top, was about to be worked on. Vince came back and nixed it, saying they are to do nothing involving Shawn. This was after okaying it."
|
So was it really from Meltzer, or just "from Melzter?" Because a lot of fake news sites cite F4W/PWI.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jakob Synn
Couldn't it be interpreted as Vince is respecting Shawns wishes to retire from wrestling and letting the legacy of Shawn Micahels be what it was and not a sham retirement like Ric Flair?
I don't know, that's what I sort of got from the whole story.
|
I fail to see how not showing matches and clips makes it any less a sham retirement. What makes Flair's retirement a sham is him getting back in the ring.