Quote:
Originally Posted by Craig T. Nelson
Because once upon a time Scott Hall was the next big thing. Also, he has charisma.
|
a lot of people liked hardy and a lot of people liked hall. prob not many people liked both, but they both had charisma and filled seats because of it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tedious
To my knowledge Hall has never turned a PPV main event into a 90-second abortion when the company was supposed to be riding on him.
|
they both arrived to perform their jobs at a live show completely fucked up on a substance (allegedly). same thing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by What Would Kevin Do?
I think the differences between Hardy and Hall are as follows.
1. Hardy is arguably in his prime, and utterly fucking it up. Basically, he has an opportunity a lot of guys would kill for, and he's blowing it. Hall on the other hand is past his prime. No one likes to see their former favorites broken down, and this is 10 times worse.
2. Hardy is a douche. IMO at least. Dunno, something about him just rubs me the wrong way.
3. Hardy's behavior made a lot of people in TNA look bad. Hall is just hurting himself
|
1. so because hall is older and looked worse, it's more excusable?
2. i don't know these people personally and i don't pretend to. i go by what i see.
3. don't understand that. hardy embarrassed himself by being unable to perform and forced a one-move squash match to cover for it. that doesn't make anybody else look bad. or did you mean the tna directors? in which case, hall's behavior does the same thing to whatever independent show he was at.
i'm not defending hardy or attacking hall. i'm just saying, they are doing the
exact same thing to themselves. so crying for one and spitting on the other seems kinda stupid.