![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Would Ambrose deliberately costing Reigns his match at Fast Lane be a good idea? | |||
| Yes |
|
8 | 53.33% |
| No |
|
7 | 46.67% |
| Voters: 15. You must log in or register to vote on this poll. | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Father of Hinduship
Posts: 21,083
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
QUESTION - Would Dean Ambrose costing Roman Reigns his match against Daniel Bryan be a good idea?
At Fast Lane, Dean Ambrose unexpectedly interferes during the Reigns/Bryan match, and deliberately costs Reigns the match. Bryan wins the match, and then goes on to face Lesnar at Mania.' Ambrose's actions can be explained due to jealousy (i.e. Reigns and Rollins going to new heights since The Shield broke up while he kind of got left behind), or bitterness (i.e. Ambrose argues that Reigns didn't have his back at the rumble towards the end when he got eliminated). Would this be a good idea? Would having Bryan in the main-event be a good way to ensure high fan interest, or would it reek of desperation on the WWE's part? While a move like this probably would reek of desperation, we all saw the disturbing crowd reaction when Reigns won the rumble last month. |
|
|
|