Ok...can some one explain this too me.

[Kane Knight]

Originally Posted by Instant Classic I love how people read forums, and read results, and think they know whats going on, especially since you don't even watch wrestling KK, yet you come to these boards everyday to complain about it but anyways. My point is, WWE is just as awful as TNA, neither one is putting out stellar must see TV. I'd rather watch TNA, and their "retarded" storylines, then Vince and his "bastard", or Batista chasing the title for the last 5 months, or John Morrison wrestle CM Punk every week.

So the answer is, "You suck, BDC is right."

I don't watch WWE. I've been explicit on that point. That still doesn't make TNA any more defendable, which is what you're doing. Now, if that is the case, as it seems to be, then you're a fucking idiot, because BDC's own first post says, "If people want to see retarded long term booking, WWE already has that."

TNA does have retarded long term booking. Sorry, it's true. While I'd agree it's marginally better than WWE programming right now, that's a pretty minor plus, and for some reason, the smarks are all over ECW.

Frankly, I don't want either retarded booking stance, and I think it's bad that the argument comes down to "I'd rather watch this pile of crap than the other pile of crap," but that's what your argument hinges on. You're not able to affiratively say that TNA is good, because it's not. Even you seem to be aware of that.

So at the point you're arguing over which steaming bowl of shit is tastier, it's time to stop eating the lead paint. Especially when the initial point included an affirmative nod to how shitty and retarded WWE is.

Also, way to totally contradict yourself, dick.