I like where they are going with Matt Hardy

[Rob]

Originally Posted by BigDaddyCool Follow up question, for a title to be a world title, which is more important, to be defended across the world, or for the competitors holding and or challenging for the belt to be of multiple nationalities? I.E. If just say Americans fought for the title in its history, but it was done all across the world, or if people of any nationality fought for the title, but it was soley done in America, which would more of a world championship?

For me, a world title has to be a real title. I don't really give a shit about a wrestling prop but for argument sake, I'm more impressed when it's defended in more places than Nashville and Orlando. I'm also more impressed when it's not a glorified indy title defended infront of 600 members of the trench coat mafia who hate everything remotely popular outside of their jerk circle.