I don't understand... (ECW SPOILERS)

**Jeritron** · 02-11-2009, 08:43 PM

They don't have the potential for a two hour show. Christian helps, but after him you have Swagger and Finlay.
Bourne and Miz/Morrison are exciting, but they're just midcarders being groomed for Raw.

Raw and Smackdown have far deeper rosters, and even they sometimes have a hard time producing a 2 hour show. Just in the past year they've both improved a lot, but any roster of Raw or Smackdown from the past 7 years has been deeper than ECW's is now.

A 2 hour ECW would not be good. There's only one or two main event stars, if that, and a couple of solid midcard potential.
It's a great 1 hour show, and it could be getting greater, but...yea.

I think if they threw like 2 or 3 more legit main eventers and an uppermidcard star on the show, then maybe it'd be a stronger argument, but as of right now I see none.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

02-11-2009, 08:43 PM	#11
Jeritron Get a poke on Posts: 35,234	They don't have the potential for a two hour show. Christian helps, but after him you have Swagger and Finlay. Bourne and Miz/Morrison are exciting, but they're just midcarders being groomed for Raw. Raw and Smackdown have far deeper rosters, and even they sometimes have a hard time producing a 2 hour show. Just in the past year they've both improved a lot, but any roster of Raw or Smackdown from the past 7 years has been deeper than ECW's is now. A 2 hour ECW would not be good. There's only one or two main event stars, if that, and a couple of solid midcard potential. It's a great 1 hour show, and it could be getting greater, but...yea. I think if they threw like 2 or 3 more legit main eventers and an uppermidcard star on the show, then maybe it'd be a stronger argument, but as of right now I see none.