Quote:
Originally Posted by KillerWolf
obviously not, but in 2004 if that European nobody had KO'ed DeLaHoya instead of only dominate him, he wouldnt have lost either. but since he didnt KO him, the decision went to DeLaHoya. if Matt Hammil would have KO'ed or submitted Bisping, he wouldnt have lost either, but he only dominated him, so the decision went to Bisping. in that case, i have a pretty good idea why the judges were biased. in this case, it's clear that they were, but i dont know why.
my point was that i've seen biased decisions before and this decision was clearly biased - not just inept.
|
this is whats driving me crazy.... before you were talking about a fixed fight! bias is not the same. If machida/delahoya/bisbing were KOed, they would have still lost so there is no fix!