![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Father of Hinduship
Posts: 21,083
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
Being a World Champion on Smackdown isn't that much more prestigious than what it would have been like to be an Intercontinental Champion 10 years ago. In the last 5+ years, the WWE hasn't been able to create successful and legitimate main-event superstars. The reason for this, is that NONE OF THESE GUYS have made a main-event impact on the show that matters most: RAW. Why do think a guy like Ken Kennedy never panned out? Whatever happened to Carlitto's promise? Or Shelton Benjamin's? Why do you think guys like John Morrison never get popped? Does anyone really expect anything to happen with Kofi Kingston (on RAW), with guys like Cena, Orton, HHH, and HBK there? Has Jack Swagger done ANYTHING of significance on RAW? If not, then wouldn't you agree that him leaving ECW has done ECW more harm than it's done in bolstering RAW? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Doin' It Right
Posts: 35,461
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
It's this mentality by a large portion of wrestling fans that is hurting ECW and SD more than anything.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Father of Hinduship
Posts: 21,083
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
That's an absurd comment. How about the fact that the WWE THEMSELVES make the RAW World title be made to look far more prestigious which is WHY the marks think as such. There's a reason why guys like Jeff Hardy and CM Punk have been world champions on Smackdown, but not on RAW. You are completely and utterly delusional if you think that the WWE doesn't position the RAW Heavyweight title to be far more prestigious than the Smackdown Heavyweight title. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Doin' It Right
Posts: 35,461
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
In my mind, CM Punk is just as prestigious a champion as John Cena and Randy Orton. It's all in the way you watch these shows. By your logic, Batista, Edge and the Undertaker rank lower as champions than John Cena and Randy Orton. You can chose to accept that as fact, but I just don't see it that way. WWE also tells me that John Cena is one of the best wrestlers ever, doesn't mean I have to believe it or accept it. Last edited by Juan; 11-03-2009 at 06:42 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Father of Hinduship
Posts: 21,083
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
I guess the ultimate point I'm making is this: RAW is still being pegged as the #1 show, while a guy like Triple H is still being pegged as the absolute best in the business (in an indirect way). It would be MUCH better for a guy like CM Punk to actually get a clean victory over a guy like Triple H in a big PPV main-event at some point. At some point - it would be awesome to push a guy like CM Punk in the same manner that John Cena and Dave Batista were. That's all I'm saying. Until that happens, Punk will never become the star, or achieve the credibility, that the WWE wants. This goes for ANY young and promising star in the WWE. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
RIP SABU
Posts: 35,585
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
However, (NEVER thought I'd see myself type this next part) I must agree with Juan that it doesn't really matter which show holds the WWE title and which one holds the World Heavyweight title. By using your very same logic as a devil's advocate thing here, I could, although, inaccurately, biasedly (if that's even a word) say that the World Heavyweight Championship is more prestigious on SD! because the first time it was held by someone on SD! it wasn't awarded to them, the way Triple H's title was by Bischoff. Doesn't make it true. When you take a good hard look at who was on what brands when they won the World title, I think you'd have to admit that your statement that the World title is more prestigious on RAW than on SD! is utterly ridiculous. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | ||
|
Father of Hinduship
Posts: 21,083
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
Why do you think the WWE moved Jeff Hardy over to Smackdown, as opposed to letting him stay on RAW back in 2008? Why do you think guys like Edge, Big Show (post 2003), Booker T, RVD, Rey Mysterio, etc. all become world champions on shows OTHER than RAW? Why do you think that for most Wrestlemania's, the RAW main-event is the final match on the card? (and that whenever Smackdown has the 'final title match' on the card, it always involves Undertaker winning?). Quote:
As much as we want guys like Jeff Hardy, CM Punk, etc. to be seen in the same light as Cena, Orton, Batista, and Triple H, the WWE does see them as such....and does not regard them as such. THIS is what needs to be changed in my opinion. Winning a world title does not hold as much significance nowadays as it once did....especially if this world title victory comes on Smackdown (CM Punk), ECW (Christian), or even on RAW if one is positioned as a transitional champ (Jericho). The one TRUE thing that really matters, is if you are pushed as THE #1 guy in the company (and this is no longer synonymous with being world champ). The ONLY way a guy be a legit #1 guy in the company right now (i.e. the "face" of the company), is if they have a lengthy World Heavyweight title reign......on RAW.....AND a 100% clean victory is obtained over Triple H. This is why guys like John Cena and Dave Batista became as big as they did. It's also one reason why Chris Benoit's victory in 2004 was so huge (although unfortunately for Benoit, he was pushed as a transitional champ). It is also the reason why Edge, as many World titles as he's won, and as much of the man that he is, has NEVER been considered to be the "#1 guy in the company" at any point in his career. I truly hope that changes within the next few years. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
A Property of Matter
Posts: 25,543
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
Part of the reason the WWE hasn't created many new stars is that John Cena has been unbeatable. One guy (Bobby Lashley) left. Another reason is because they give as much time to the Divas as they do the undercard. There just isn't time on PPVs for non-title feuds. Kennedy never panned out because he kept getting injured and he just never got off the ground. Carlito is still okay when he wants to be, but doesn't really have a character or direction. Shelton is one guy who has never really given up, but as hard as he tries the fans have never really gotten behind firmly. Again, lack of undercard makes it impossible to build stars. The current situation on Raw is not helping with all the guest hosts. Swagger has a great look, he can wrestle, and can talk. He is actually involved in an angle on Raw right now. There really wasn't anything left for him to do on ECW. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Father of Hinduship
Posts: 21,083
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
Excellent overall post. I would comment more on it but I pretty much agree with everything you said. I especially agree with you on the fact that the Diva's get *way* too much TV time. I would like to see them get the T.V. time that they were getting during the Attitude Era. For actual female wrestlers that are legitimate competitors, and not just eye candy, I think it would be interesting to just lump them all on ECW and see if they attract a new demographic, etc. With the female competitors out of the way on the main shows, it then allows more time for the under card wrestlers to strutt their stuff. |
|
|
|
|