![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Cranky Kong
Posts: 78,671
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Show Off, I feel your lists are flawed. Mick Foley shouldn't be on any in-ring list of any kind (besides most willing to do ridiculous bumps)...Hulk Hogan is more charismatic than Shawn Michaels, and probably the rest of that list too...Ric Flair should not be toping the heel/face list, he's a heel at heart....I DUNNO BRO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Total Non-Stop Apologist
Posts: 4,430
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
However, I think the 4 above Hogan are more charismatic then him, Hogan was charismatic as hell but not more than any of the men above him... Foley was great at telling a story in the ring. He wasn't good technically, hence why I didn't put him on the technical list. The reason foley seperated himself from The Sandman or Sabu (also guys willing to do bumps) was his ability to tell a story. Look at his matches with The Rock and all of them have clearly defined storys going on. Nuanced stories that very few people could pull off... Flair has switched from heel to face and was willing to swich from heel to face more than any other wrestler in the history of wrestling. From 1983 to 1991 Flair was the #1 heel or #1 face in the NWA for his entire run. His ability to swich roles was better than anyone in history. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
b/c 5 is better than 4
Posts: 9,721
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Total Non-Stop Apologist
Posts: 4,430
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
Foley carried the weight of the story of that match... |
|
|
|
|