![]() |
|
View Poll Results: Which half of HBK's Career is better? | |||
First Half (1991-1998) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
14 | 43.75% |
Second Half (2002-present) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
18 | 56.25% |
Voters: 32. You must log in or register to vote on this poll. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#32 |
Get a poke on
Posts: 35,234
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Depends on what you value too. We haven't seen many, or any of these house show matches.
What is more valuable, having solid matches every week and 1 classic every few years? or having standard house matches, and 1 or 2 classics a year? It boils to down to what your criteria is. Workrate and overall consistency is different than an overall body of work. To me, I could care less if he's not working many house or tv matches, but choose to focus on the fact that he's pumped out a bunch of instant classics. In other words, I'd rather watch him work 5 mediocre matches with Kozlov and then tear the house down with Taker, than see him have 5 entertaining but forgettable matches with Jeff Jarrett. Either way, I voted for his first run. That's because I also factored in things like promos, fueds, his run at the top, and the fact that he was going out there and making classics happen from scratch. |
![]() |
![]() |