Triple H or Cena to allign with Nexus?

[XL]

(insert apologetics blaming WWE for the next imagined failure)

I might be way off base here, but I think KK is saying that Nexus isn't failing, but every minor setback is being blown way out of proportion by the IWC.

But hey, that's what we do, right?

[Kane Knight]

Originally Posted by VSG No, but I do and hence I was the one who edited that page.

OH LORD OF THE DEAD! WHAT IS YOUR BIDDING, MY MASTER?

Originally Posted by Noid I think you were trying to take a jab at the IWC, which you are apart of, but it still doesn't change the point that your attempt to burn them, be funny, or whatever, is incorrect. The Nexus aren't really failing. That's all there is to the story.

Actually, it isn't. Like usual, you are missing a key piece of what I said and fucking up in the process.

I'll let XL explain.

Originally Posted by XL (insert apologetics blaming WWE for the next imagined failure) I might be way off base here, but I think KK is saying that Nexus isn't failing, but every minor setback is being blown way out of proportion by the IWC. But hey, that's what we do, right?

Also, for someone who corrects me on the spelling of strawman (a viable alternative spelling of straw man), you might want to consider that "apart" means "set aside from." So you're trying to say I'm "a part of" the IWC, but instead, you are setting me "apart" from.

And then there's your confusion of "smark" and "IWC." though XL missed that too, and he was thinking, so I think we can forgive that. There's also the notion that someone doesn't have to be "apart from" a body to criticise the body as a whole, but you've had that explained to you by me and others.

But hey, why let what I actually said or any sort of logic get in the way of bitching about the things you made up? That's what Noid does.

[Mr. Nerfect]

Originally Posted by Kane Knight OH LORD OF THE DEAD! WHAT IS YOUR BIDDING, MY MASTER? Actually, it isn't. Like usual, you are missing a key piece of what I said and fucking up in the process. I'll let XL explain. Also, for someone who corrects me on the spelling of strawman (a viable alternative spelling of straw man), you might want to consider that "apart" means "set aside from." So you're trying to say I'm "a part of" the IWC, but instead, you are setting me "apart" from. And then there's your confusion of "smark" and "IWC." though XL missed that too, and he was thinking, so I think we can forgive that. There's also the notion that someone doesn't have to be "apart from" a body to criticise the body as a whole, but you've had that explained to you by me and others. But hey, why let what I actually said or any sort of logic get in the way of bitching about the things you made up? That's what Noid does.

Yawn. I only took you up on that because you prided yourself on your writing. It obviously stung, because you're still bringing it up. And KK -- you're discussing wrestling on the internet. You're part of the internet wrestling community.

I just find it funny that you often target people for things they don't actually say, or that you yourself are guilty of. Yet, I suppose you accuse me of the same things. So I'm just going to admit that I sometimes stoop to your level. At least I can admit I'm as bad as you. And at least I generally have a sunny disposition about things. Everything is sarcasm this, sarcasm that with you. The lowest form of wit, man. But I'm sure you've heard it.

[Kane Knight]

Originally Posted by Noid Yawn. I only took you up on that because you prided yourself on your writing.

That would make sense....If I spelled it wrong. I didn't.

It obviously stung, because you're still bringing it up.

Brought it up once. You'll dredge up arguments from years ago...I haven't mentioned writing anything in ages, and you're still on about that.

Your sense of "pride" must be different from mine, to boot.

And KK -- you're discussing wrestling on the internet. You're part of the internet wrestling community.

I never said I wasn't.

However, I did say "smark," not IWC. Posting on the internet discussing wrestling does not make one a smark. Also, as has been explained to you numerous times, one can be a part of a community and criticise it as a whole without doing anything wrong. I didn't do it, but that doesn't mean you cannot. I don't know why you can't grasp that.

I just find it funny that you often target people for things they don't actually say

False.

Yet, I suppose you accuse me of the same things.

You clearly do, since you're doing it here. Right now. Demonstrably so.

So I'm just going to admit that I sometimes stoop to your level. At least I can admit I'm as bad as you.

You stoop to a level you attribute to me based on things you make up. I do not make any attempt to pretend I'm a snarky bitch. I'm not going to cop to things I don't do, however, just to please you.

And if being "sunny" means getting your knickers in a twist when someone makes jokes about smarks crying doom (By the way, smarks cried doom right here on TPWW.net! *cheap pop*), you can keep it.

Everything is sarcasm this, sarcasm that with you.

Except when it's not. Which is fairly frequently. But I suppose it's easier for you to deal in absolutes.

The lowest form of wit, man

So says an autistic who claims to be a comedian but can't come up with anything funny. Gotta sting to have no creativity when you so clearly want to have it.

[Mr. Nerfect]

Originally Posted by XL (insert apologetics blaming WWE for the next imagined failure) I might be way off base here, but I think KK is saying that Nexus isn't failing, but every minor setback is being blown way out of proportion by the IWC. But hey, that's what we do, right?

Two-pronged assault, I think. On one hand, he does say "imagined failure," but on the other, he's talking about how we're all blaming the WWE for it failing. When KK is the only one really talking about it failing. It's basically a huge mess of a statement.