Quote:
Originally Posted by Aguakate
A couple polls ago, I went the route you are going down, of actually voting for who I thought was the better actual WRESTLER, the one who had the most ability, and was told that that's NOT what these polls are all about...that you have to take into account the actual ability, but also the impact each guy had on wrestling, their charisma, their mic work, etc...
"If wrestling ability was the only thing that mattered, Dean Malenko would be in the HOF", I was told...
...so I get you...
Still...ROCK > Eddie.
|
If you'll recall, that conversation arose because you were getting uppity about people not voting for Eddie over Andre because Eddie was the better in ring talent. My response to you was that this was not Better Ring Technician, it's Better Wrestler. And even though you personally might associate the word wrestler solely with in ring skills, it may mean something else to other people. And neither interpretation is wrong. That's the beauty of it. That's what creates the debate. And it's why we've had 215 of these things and only have 11 Hall of Famers.