Official Bound For Glory thread--10/23/05

**PureHatred** · 10-24-2005, 12:41 AM

LC and Fox are looking at this from two totally different viewpoints; one as a hardcore wrestling fan, and one as a booker and how they should/wqould be trying to make money.

Rhino seriously has not been treated as a main eventer on TNA. I know that part of it is that they were building up JJ/Nash, so there was no reason to build Rhino up for a title shot; this was just a last second decisison. But still...

So basically the question became whether it made more sense to put the belt on a guy who has only been on TV in a passing manner in the last month, who had almost zero heat headed into the PPv or to keep the belt on JJ, TNA's most established commodity.

I would've let JJ retain.

10-24-2005, 12:41 AM	#9
PureHatred Instant Credibility Posts: 2,979	LC and Fox are looking at this from two totally different viewpoints; one as a hardcore wrestling fan, and one as a booker and how they should/wqould be trying to make money. Rhino seriously has not been treated as a main eventer on TNA. I know that part of it is that they were building up JJ/Nash, so there was no reason to build Rhino up for a title shot; this was just a last second decisison. But still... So basically the question became whether it made more sense to put the belt on a guy who has only been on TV in a passing manner in the last month, who had almost zero heat headed into the PPv or to keep the belt on JJ, TNA's most established commodity. I would've let JJ retain.