|
|
|
03-28-2006, 05:49 PM
|
#1 |
|
Two weeks.
Posts: 6,406
 
|
the serpents eyes tell a story...
|
|
|
|
03-28-2006, 05:53 PM
|
#2 | |
|
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
|
Quote:
I remember the book that told me Not to look in the serpent's eyes I remember the things she showed me and I can't control myself... |
|
|
|
|
|
03-28-2006, 07:37 PM
|
#3 |
|
Posts: 28
|
first of all Flair is not god.. hes 20yrs past his prime.. Taker and Henry need to kill each other because taker is an old fart and henry.. well. hes henry..
TNA-- yeah whatever .. u obviously cant get the point of context so yea,, Daniels, Styles, and Joe are the only wrestlers in TNA that have any chance at all of a decent career.. u know eventually theyll be in WWE hopefully theyll force out overrated old people like Michaels Flair Finlay Taker Foley.. etc etc.. U guys are obviously all over Cages Johnson which seems like a personal problem.. the fans never tryed to push him. the only pops he ever got was in Canada. And about Sting... who cares how his name got ratings if WWE wanted to deal with the wifebeatin Lex Luger theyd have those ratings too./.. so since u guys are alll over Jarretts Johnson youlll never believe me about the WCW=TNA comparison but hey thats all you..... im not sayin ur right and im not saying ur wrong... since this is America everyone can say what they want and personally i plan on never leaving the forum so yea thats on you.. PS= dont think ur cool cuz u know the meanie... i mean c'mon hes doin house shows for wrestling schools selling BWO pics for $5 so yea guess hes not so hot after all huh?? |
|
|
|
|
03-29-2006, 09:44 AM
|
#4 | |
|
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
|
Quote:
Now you can say you meant something else, but taking your words out of context did nothing to change the context. You didn't argue they were the future, you argued they were the only draw in TNA, and that folks like Sting were killing TNA. Sorry, but Sting has been the best thing for TNA, which precipitated their new night... |
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode
