WCW/World Title

**Jeritron** · 03-30-2007, 01:17 PM

nah it's true. They can't seem to decide whether it's a new belt, the wcw belt, a second wwe belt or just a prop to keep another pool of main eventers happy.

The bottom line is since the day it was incepted it has hurt the other title and vice versa. There's room for more than one world champion in the industry, but not in one promotion. Havin 2 champion who are supposedly on an equal playing field and "main event" (which is bs since only one main events) is a detriment to the stature of the title and the promotion. It makes one inevitably seem lesser, in most cases Smackdown.
Now you have 3 world champions, which at least it's ECW and not WWE title 2.0. But still, it's a mess and needs to be simplified.

03-30-2007, 01:17 PM	#7
Jeritron Get a poke on Posts: 35,234	nah it's true. They can't seem to decide whether it's a new belt, the wcw belt, a second wwe belt or just a prop to keep another pool of main eventers happy. The bottom line is since the day it was incepted it has hurt the other title and vice versa. There's room for more than one world champion in the industry, but not in one promotion. Havin 2 champion who are supposedly on an equal playing field and "main event" (which is bs since only one main events) is a detriment to the stature of the title and the promotion. It makes one inevitably seem lesser, in most cases Smackdown. Now you have 3 world champions, which at least it's ECW and not WWE title 2.0. But still, it's a mess and needs to be simplified.