![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
TPWW's Glass Ceiling
Posts: 5,793
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Posts: 61,572
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yeah, it all depends on who are holding the belts. I was fine with Paul London & Brian Kendrick's long reign with the WWE Tag Team Championship, Gregory Helms' reign with the WWE Cruiserweight Championship and currently Chris Benoit's reign with the WWE United States Championship. Those guys make good Champions. John Cena shouldn't have won the WWE Title for a second time, let alone gotten this long a run with it.
They should have ended his first run with Chris Jericho, to be honest. But they have Cena continue to steamroll through him. Then it should have been Kurt Angle, but alas. Switching the title semi-frequently isn't necessarily a bad thing, though. You don't need to always swap between new guys, too. That gets confusing, and often very boring. Occasionally a few swaps back and forth between established main event guys (i.e. former World Champions) like Triple H and The Rock in 2000. Cena and HBK are two guys who could logically trade the belt in a series at present. |
![]() |
![]() |