TPWW Forums  

Go Back   TPWW Forums > o f f t o p i c > sports forum
Reload this Page College Football 2007 Thread
Register Members List

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-25-2007, 06:32 PM   #1
BCWWF
The People's Member
 
Posts: 18,092
BCWWF is good (20,000+)BCWWF is good (20,000+)BCWWF is good (20,000+)BCWWF is good (20,000+)BCWWF is good (20,000+)BCWWF is good (20,000+)BCWWF is good (20,000+)BCWWF is good (20,000+)
Exclamation
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reavant View Post
When USC got a share of the championship it was the year when Oklahoma was #1 all year and lost their big 12 champ game and was still ranked #1 or 2 by the BCS coputers while LSU and USC both had one loss. LSU ended up beating Oklahoma and USC fucked up a good Michigan or Penn State team. I would say USC deserved a share because they deserved to be in the game while Oklahoma did not.
I hate this argument. Oklahoma is No. 1 all year and dominated everybody they play until their conference championship game against a great Kansas State team, but then because they lose that game another one loss team, USC, is automatically better. They both had one loss and Oklahoma was far more impressive all season. Just because they lost in the last game people said they didn't deserve it. K-State was probably much better than whoever USC lost to that year.
BCWWF is offline  
Old 12-26-2007, 11:33 AM   #2
Reavant
Donkey Punch Elite
 
Reavant's Avatar
 
Posts: 9,910
Reavant has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Reavant has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Reavant has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Reavant has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Reavant has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Reavant has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Reavant has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Reavant has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Reavant has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Reavant has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by BCWWF View Post
I hate this argument. Oklahoma is No. 1 all year and dominated everybody they play until their conference championship game against a great Kansas State team, but then because they lose that game another one loss team, USC, is automatically better. They both had one loss and Oklahoma was far more impressive all season. Just because they lost in the last game people said they didn't deserve it. K-State was probably much better than whoever USC lost to that year.
Oklahoma ran the score up against shit teams all year. Thats the only reason they stayed up there in rankings. The beat texas tech 77-0 for example. hand it to em... they played the system right, but just because they pile on points doesnt mean theyre incredably dominant, it means that they dont care about the unwritten slaughter rules that coaches like to abide by which doesnt matter anyway.
Reavant is offline  
Old 12-26-2007, 03:21 PM   #3
BCWWF
The People's Member
 
Posts: 18,092
BCWWF is good (20,000+)BCWWF is good (20,000+)BCWWF is good (20,000+)BCWWF is good (20,000+)BCWWF is good (20,000+)BCWWF is good (20,000+)BCWWF is good (20,000+)BCWWF is good (20,000+)
Exclamation
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reavant View Post
Oklahoma ran the score up against shit teams all year. Thats the only reason they stayed up there in rankings. The beat texas tech 77-0 for example. hand it to em... they played the system right, but just because they pile on points doesnt mean theyre incredably dominant, it means that they dont care about the unwritten slaughter rules that coaches like to abide by which doesnt matter anyway.
First, I'm pretty sure it was A&M, and second, 77 points on A&M is an impressive feat no matter what.
BCWWF is offline  
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:56 AM.

Forums Home - TPWW - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin®