TPWW Forums  

Go Back   TPWW Forums > w r e s t l i n g > wrestling forum
Reload this Page Should TNA even have their own "answer" to WrestleMania?
Register Members List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-27-2007, 07:47 PM   #1
6to1
 
Posts: 1,279
6to1 does not have that much rep yet (10+)
i thought slamaversary was the big one for them.
6to1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2007, 12:42 AM   #2
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,533
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 6to1 View Post
i thought slamaversary was the big one for them.
Slammiversary is closer to their equivalent to Summerslam. TNA's "big three" PPVs are Bound For Glory, Slammiversary and Lockdown (probably in that order).

Xero, BDC and KK seem to think that it's a good idea for TNA to have a "big four," or something similar. I see their reasoning, but part of me thinks that it waters down the rest of the year. Of course, that could just be the WWE's shit getting in my head. In 2000, the WWE managed to put on some great sleeper PPVs, for example. You don't need to have a big PPV to have a good quality one.

I just don't know how they are going to promote something as the biggest show of the year. "Hey, this event has no history, but it's bigger than the rest anyway because we actually try!" Slammiversary has King of the Mountain, which works for them. Lockdown has the excessive steel cages. I just don't know what or how Bound For Glory should be special.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2007, 09:50 AM   #3
BigDaddyCool
Pelvic Sorcerer
 
BigDaddyCool's Avatar
 
Posts: 64,762
BigDaddyCool makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)BigDaddyCool makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)BigDaddyCool makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)BigDaddyCool makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)BigDaddyCool makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)BigDaddyCool makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)BigDaddyCool makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)BigDaddyCool makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)BigDaddyCool makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)BigDaddyCool makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)BigDaddyCool makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)BigDaddyCool makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)BigDaddyCool makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alienoid06 View Post
Slammiversary is closer to their equivalent to Summerslam. TNA's "big three" PPVs are Bound For Glory, Slammiversary and Lockdown (probably in that order).

Xero, BDC and KK seem to think that it's a good idea for TNA to have a "big four," or something similar.
I never said that. I said they only need to keep the ppvs they are making money on. I never gave a solid number. If they are breaking even or making money on every ppv, then keep them all. If they can only make money on 1, then keep that one, and make it extra special, make that the equilient of Maina or Starcade. If by scaling down, they get to a point where they only have 4 or 5, make those bigger shows of equal importance.

Also, their ppv titles suck.
BigDaddyCool is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2007, 05:27 AM   #4
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,533
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigDaddyCool View Post
I never said that. I said they only need to keep the ppvs they are making money on. I never gave a solid number. If they are breaking even or making money on every ppv, then keep them all. If they can only make money on 1, then keep that one, and make it extra special, make that the equilient of Maina or Starcade. If by scaling down, they get to a point where they only have 4 or 5, make those bigger shows of equal importance.

Also, their ppv titles suck.
You said they need an anchor for the year.

KK said that they need to establish good PPVs first.

Both imply to me that you think it's a good idea that there is a bigger PPV that stands out moreso than the others. I'm not saying that's a bad thing, that's just what I got from the subtext of your posts, even though you both talked about how the current product is crap, which is not what I'm looking to discuss.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:40 PM.

Forums Home - TPWW - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin®