Wow, some weird news tidbits:

[Fox]

Originally Posted by Alienoid06 I've said several times I agree with that, but I don't see how having two belts on ECW is impossible to manage. Maybe if they only had half-an-hour every week. They have a full hour, it's possible to establish two. I personally agree that there should be a WWE World Heavyweight Championship between the three brands, with a WWE World Tag Team Championship between the three, Women's Championship between the three, with the IC Title on RAW, US Title on SmackDown! and a new TV Title on ECW.

ECW itself is too small to have a secondary championship belt right now. They barely have a large enough talent pool to challenge Punk for the ECW title itself. If you're talking about a new championship to be defended on both ECW and Smackdown, that's completely different, but a second ECW belt is just absurd right now. They have like 3 throwaway matches a week, and throwing a title on one of them isn't going to make it any better.

Also, your reasoning for why the WWE doesn't need a Cruiserweight title isn't really very strong. The fact that Jamie Noble, John Morrison and Yang are getting a slight push right now in different divisions doesn't negate the fact that a Cruiserweight divison, when done right, can be the garnish on the plate of an excellent meal. It can steal the show in terms of wrestling, and by doing that it only helps to compliment the main event and the "sports-entertainment." WCW did this successfully for years and it was one of their best areas. When the main event sucked, at least you knew that the cruiserweights were going to pull out some hot shit, and a lot of times those matches were for the Cruiserweight Title.

Just because WWE hasn't EVER been able to pull of a lightweight division successfully doesn't mean it's not a good idea.