![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Of course, "realistically," 99% of us couldn't play soccer worth a shit, and forget web-slinging, driving like a maniac, or shooting up police.
Sorry, but talking about how it's realistic doesn't particularly sound like a solid argument to me. You can make an immersive envornment without brand names pretty easily, and with the rising cost of video games, I don't see why anyone should pay to start at retarded advertisements. I mean, sure, there's always some idiot who says "I don't mind it," Whether it be waterboarding at Gitmo or the nickel increase in the Subway menu, but whatever. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Not Fignuts OLE!
Posts: 3,306
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Well, relatively realistic. Developers are taking a fantastic and unrealistic concept and putting it in a realistic setting. I think the more realistic the setting for an unrealistic concept, the easier it is to immerse yourself. And by no means am I saying we NEED these ads in. Nor am I saying that they even make that big a difference. But if done well it certainly adds a bit of help. And it certainly doesn't hurt as much as many of these people against it, think it does. |
|
![]() |
![]() |