![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
God Bless America
Posts: 37,905
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Interpol, The Pixies and The Smiths are "indie"?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
bonjour
Posts: 27,814
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Well, the Pixies were released on 4AD, Artemis, and Spin Records. They only had two major label releases. Why wouldn't they be "indie?" You know, in the non-retarded definition.
Speaking of which, Mission of Burma, FA. Don't know if you'd like their more dissonant shit, but at least look up "That's When I Reach For My Revolver," "Academy Fight Song," "Max Earnst," and "Fame and Fortune." I personally think their newer shit is actually better, with a great dissonant quality and an artistic edge, but the early shit is probably what will give you an idea. Again, with releases on Ace of Heat and Matador records, they're definitely an indie act. |
![]() |
![]() |