If you ran

**thedamndest** · 08-10-2008, 10:15 PM

WWE:

Who would you push as your Top 5 stars?
1. Edge
2. Randy Orton
3. Undertaker
4. Jericho
5. HHH

Who would you build as the future of the company?
1. MVP
2. Kofi Kingston
3. Mr. Kennedy
4. Lance Cade
5. Ted DiBiase

Who would be your current champions?
-WWE: HHH
-World: Orton
-ECW: does not exist
-Intercontinental: Lance Cade
-United States: Matt Hardy
-Women's: Mickie
-Diva's does not exist
-World Tag Team: DiBiase/Rhodes (if this is the one on Raw)
-WWE Tag Team: Hawkins/Ryder are fine
==============

Which 5 workers (if any) would you most consider firing?
1. Khali
2. Mark Henry
3. Hornswoggle
4. Maria
5. Candice

Which 5 free agents (if any) would you most consider signing?
I don't know who is available. They can barely manage their current undercard, so bringing in new guys is the last thing they need to do.

What would you consider most important as far as the growth and success of the company?
A) Building the company around current top stars
B) Establishing new stars and pushing young talent
C) Focusing less on angles and more on wrestling(or vice versa, please specify)
D) Improving quality of storylines and booking, while keeping angles-to-wrestling ratio about the same
E) Other (explain):

You need to build the show around your main guys. They are what sell your tickets. That said, your undercard guys will BE your main event if you do them correctly, listen to the fans, don't let titles stand in for a feud. Squash matches are a waste of everyone's time, monsters NEVER get over as monsters. Angles work best when they are utilized in the form of more wrestling and less backstage segments. I'm not tuning in because I want to watch a half hour of backstage segments for eight minutes of wrestling match that consists of a roll-up. I also hate being blatantly advertised to in every possible medium. WWE is should be wrestling company, and since becoming publically traded and branching out has lost sight of that.

08-10-2008, 10:15 PM	#11
thedamndest A Property of Matter Posts: 25,543	WWE: Who would you push as your Top 5 stars? 1. Edge 2. Randy Orton 3. Undertaker 4. Jericho 5. HHH Who would you build as the future of the company? 1. MVP 2. Kofi Kingston 3. Mr. Kennedy 4. Lance Cade 5. Ted DiBiase Who would be your current champions? -WWE: HHH -World: Orton -ECW: does not exist -Intercontinental: Lance Cade -United States: Matt Hardy -Women's: Mickie -Diva's does not exist -World Tag Team: DiBiase/Rhodes (if this is the one on Raw) -WWE Tag Team: Hawkins/Ryder are fine ============== Which 5 workers (if any) would you most consider firing? 1. Khali 2. Mark Henry 3. Hornswoggle 4. Maria 5. Candice Which 5 free agents (if any) would you most consider signing? I don't know who is available. They can barely manage their current undercard, so bringing in new guys is the last thing they need to do. What would you consider most important as far as the growth and success of the company? A) Building the company around current top stars B) Establishing new stars and pushing young talent C) Focusing less on angles and more on wrestling(or vice versa, please specify) D) Improving quality of storylines and booking, while keeping angles-to-wrestling ratio about the same E) Other (explain): You need to build the show around your main guys. They are what sell your tickets. That said, your undercard guys will BE your main event if you do them correctly, listen to the fans, don't let titles stand in for a feud. Squash matches are a waste of everyone's time, monsters NEVER get over as monsters. Angles work best when they are utilized in the form of more wrestling and less backstage segments. I'm not tuning in because I want to watch a half hour of backstage segments for eight minutes of wrestling match that consists of a roll-up. I also hate being blatantly advertised to in every possible medium. WWE is should be wrestling company, and since becoming publically traded and branching out has lost sight of that.