Do you think that Cena's becomeing a bigger babyface then Hulk or Lex?

**NeanderCarl** · 10-23-2008, 03:55 PM

I didn't say anything to the contrary, it's just that Cena is famous on a lesser scale than Hogan or Austin were. But like I say, that doesn't have to neccessarily have any bearing on the "is he as successful a babyface" question.

As for Google hits, they're probably not completely meaningless, but if the internet was as vast and accessible in 1998 as it is today, I'm sure Austin's hits would outnumber Cena's today, comparitively.

**Kane Knight** · 10-23-2008, 11:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Class Act Carl

I didn't say anything to the contrary, it's just that Cena is famous on a lesser scale than Hogan or Austin were. But like I say, that doesn't have to neccessarily have any bearing on the "is he as successful a babyface" question.

As for Google hits, they're probably not completely meaningless, but if the internet was as vast and accessible in 1998 as it is today, I'm sure Austin's hits would outnumber Cena's today, comparitively.

That's pointless speculation, though.

10-23-2008, 03:55 PM	#1
NeanderCarl That's Not My Name Posts: 9,086	I didn't say anything to the contrary, it's just that Cena is famous on a lesser scale than Hogan or Austin were. But like I say, that doesn't have to neccessarily have any bearing on the "is he as successful a babyface" question. As for Google hits, they're probably not completely meaningless, but if the internet was as vast and accessible in 1998 as it is today, I'm sure Austin's hits would outnumber Cena's today, comparitively.