When Michaels retires...

[Kane Knight]

Originally Posted by BigDaddyCool Noid, do you understand that the words you type on the reply window is what makes up your points and that your internal thoughts don't count as part of the argument on TPWW? So if you don't literally mean something, you have to make some sort of indication to the rest of us that you don't really mean it. This can be archived in a number of ways, one of the sacrastic smilies, making an astrix and then saying "I'm joking" or something like that, completely piling on the sacrasim until it is unmistakably not literal, and many other way. You saying something then 20 post later coming back and saying you didn't really mean it and everyone else is an idiot for not knowing that you were being faceteous.

Haha....You actually spelled facetious the way I told you to....

No, but seriously, BDC, it's retarded to expect people to always denote when they're not being absolutely literal, and nobody should ever realistically expect that. And if it weren't Noid as the center of this argument, it wouldn't be so goddamn hilarious. Let Noid's "Chris Crocker" squad bitch about how I'm attacking Noid, but something like 80% of the time he argues with me ends up being based on him taking literal that which shouldn't be, so it's adorable that he's casting stones from that glass house.

But BDC, now you're taking the Noid approach. "God Dammit, Noid, I'm too stupid to properly interpret your non-literal statements, so it's your fault!"

[Ruien]

Originally Posted by Kane Knight Haha....You actually spelled facetious the way I told you to.... No, but seriously, BDC, it's retarded to expect people to always denote when they're not being absolutely literal, and nobody should ever realistically expect that. And if it weren't Noid as the center of this argument, it wouldn't be so goddamn hilarious. Let Noid's "Chris Crocker" squad bitch about how I'm attacking Noid, but something like 80% of the time he argues with me ends up being based on him taking literal that which shouldn't be, so it's adorable that he's casting stones from that glass house. But BDC, now you're taking the Noid approach. "God Dammit, Noid, I'm too stupid to properly interpret your non-literal statements, so it's your fault!"

Whow, I am shocked. Someone put this in their sig, "Kane Knight defends Noid over BDC".

[Mr. Nerfect]

Originally Posted by Kane Knight Haha....You actually spelled facetious the way I told you to.... No, but seriously, BDC, it's retarded to expect people to always denote when they're not being absolutely literal, and nobody should ever realistically expect that. And if it weren't Noid as the center of this argument, it wouldn't be so goddamn hilarious. Let Noid's "Chris Crocker" squad bitch about how I'm attacking Noid, but something like 80% of the time he argues with me ends up being based on him taking literal that which shouldn't be, so it's adorable that he's casting stones from that glass house. But BDC, now you're taking the Noid approach. "God Dammit, Noid, I'm too stupid to properly interpret your non-literal statements, so it's your fault!"

I've never understood this "Noid is linear" thing you have with me. Being non-linear in my every day life has actually got me into quite a bit of trouble. Sometimes I take issue with the way you say things (no offense, but you sound like the most unpleasant person in the world to know sometimes), but very rarely do I take anything you say literally. I know you're acting like a cock because you can. But that's the problem I have with it.

But thank you for not taking BDC's side just because you can.

Also, the reason Tedious is attacking me so vehemently is because I agreed with the statement that in one form or another, Goldberg might just be more relevant than Shawn Michaels. Something that even Xero has conceded to.